American Shad

American shad eggs in hatchery. Copyright 2010 Jay Fleming/iLCPAmerican shad eggs. © 2010 Jay Fleming/iLCP

The Forgotten Fishery

"Just as the sacred cod of Massachusetts is the accepted emblem of the Bay State, so the shad may rightly be considered the piscatorial representative of the states bordering the Chesapeake." ~Rachel Carson, Baltimore Sun, 1936

For 200 years, American shad was the most valuable and important fishery in the Chesapeake Bay. But after decades of harvest pressure, pollution, and migration barriers, this iconic fish is quite simply in trouble.

Shad's Key Role in Chesapeake Culture

American Shad, members of the herring family, have long been important to the economic and cultural heritage of our East Coast communities. A critical source of food for striped bass and bluefish, shad are found up and down the Atlantic coast from Canada to Florida. They visit the Chesapeake Bay each spring when it comes time to spawn in freshwater rivers, including the James, Potomac, and Susquehanna. By summer, shad leave the Bay for open ocean waters.

Throughout the colonial period, this springtime migration brought tremendous schools of migratory shad to their rivers of origin and became an amazing biological event and an important part of Chesapeake culture.

One early account described the importance of shad throughout the watershed: "There were no dams barring access to the highest reaches of the rivers and no cities and factories to discharge pollution, so that the river herring and shad made their way far inland even to the Blue Ridge Mountains. There the pioneers awaited them eagerly each spring and salted down a supply to tide them over till next run."

Even George Washington appreciated the value of this mighty fish, becoming the most prominent American shad fisherman in the region as he landed thousands of pounds on the Potomac River. In fact, a well-known book about shad is even called The Founding Fish.

Shad's Tragic Decline

Yet, as the colonial period progressed, dams and pollution blocked shad spawning grounds in tributaries throughout the watershed. As early as 1761, Virginia was compelled to pass "an act to oblige the owners of mills, hedges, or stone-stops, on sundry rivers therein mentioned, to make openings or slopes therein for the passage of fish." Another early account suggested, "The clearing of the country, and the consequent muddying of the streams, had destroyed [shad and herring]."

Overfishing was a problem particularly during the last century, when fishing methods became more efficient. A report on the decline of shad by the Maryland Conservation Department in 1939 (now the Maryland Department of Natural Resources) included the grim statement that, "The Bay is literally strewn with fishing gears, most of which are set to catch fish all day and all night, throughout the season, thus not giving [shad] access to the breeding grounds."

Very quickly the Chesapeake shad annual harvest went from 17.5 million pounds at the turn of the century to less than two million pounds by the 1970s. The drastic decline of the fishery resulted in the closure of the shad fishery in Maryland in 1980 and in Virginia in 1990. The loss of this highly regarded "first of the year" fish for recreational anglers, commercial watermen, and seafood connoisseurs has also resulted in a loss of cultural identity.

Because these traditions finally faded with the shad in the 1960s and the 1970s, few people today under the age of 40 have ever even heard of shad.

More About Fisheries

More About Shad

You may also be interested in:
  • The Chesapeake's Unsung Hero Without this little unsung hero the Bay's ecosystem would likely collapse.
  • Mercury In Our Food In the Chesapeake watershed, mercury is responsible for more waters listed with fish consumption advisories than any other pollutant.
  • Preventing Another Striped Bass Collapse Today, "stripers" are still relatively numerous—but there are warning signs of a possible new decline.
  • CBF to PA DEP: "Add the Susquehanna River to Impaired Waters List" Recent declines in the Susquehanna's smallmouth bass health and population, along with water quality data suggesting poor conditions at key locations and at key times of the year, indicate the river fails to meet some of the basic requirements of the Clean Water Act.
  • Speaking for the Fish CBF attempts to represent the interests of the resource itself in the fisheries management process. CBF takes pride in "speaking for the fish" at legislative hearings, in regulatory forums, and directly to fishermen.

Related Links

CBF's Efforts to Restore Shad

CBF's 2010 State of the Bay Report rates the Bay's shad abundance at a dismal nine out of a possible 100. While the abundance of shad in the Chesapeake is at an historic low, there is reason to believe that this formerly valued resource can be restored. Public support is needed in the following four areas to rebuild shad stocks:

  • Conserve remaining shad populations through the fishery management plan of the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission and the work of the Federal Fishery Management Councils to reduce shad bycatch in ocean fisheries;
  • Continue the removal of dams and other tributary obstructions and install effective fishways when dam removal is not feasible;
  • Restore wetlands and forest buffers and address sources of water pollution in tributaries to improve water quality and shad spawning habitat; 
  • Support and expand, as feasible, shad hatchery production for restocking Chesapeake tributaries.

While programs to reopen spawning rivers to migration and stock hatchery-reared shad in target tributaries have shown success, shad numbers have not responded consistently.

The Potomac River has had the most apparent success, with numbers of returning adult shad increasing annually until a recent downturn. The shad run on the Susquehanna River, which had declined steadily in recent years, increased significantly in 2009 and 2010.

Similar variable results have plagued the James, Rappahannock, Nanticoke, and Patuxent rivers suggesting that stocking programs are holding their own, but other factors are preventing progress.

The most likely culprits seem to be predation on juvenile shad (possibly by non-native predators such as blue catfish) and bycatch in offshore fisheries.

You will begin to receive Bay updates from CBF soon.

In the meantime, join the Bay-friendly conversation on Facebook and Twitter!

Questions that require an answer are marked with  *
   
* Please take a moment to provide the following information so that we may keep you updated on issues and events near you.
   
 E-Mail Address
 First Name
 Last Name
 City
 Zip Code
   
* URL
   
   
* Timestamp
   
     

21 States Against A Clean Chesapeake

Goal: 75,000 signers!

 

 

1-888-SAVEBAY / 1-888-728-3229

BBB Accredited Charity

Bids & ProposalsPrivacy Policy

© 2014 Chesapeake Bay Foundation.
All Rights Reserved.

The Chesapeake Bay Foundation is a nonprofit,
tax-exempt charitable organization under
Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.
Donations are tax-deductible as allowed by law.