In the Courtroom

Sparrows Point  Copyright Garth Lens/iLCPHaving filed a lawsuit in 2010, CBF continues its active litigation which seeks a full investigation and cleanup of pollution at the Sparrows Point steel mill in Baltimore, Maryland. © 2010 Garth Lenz/iLCP

To Protect, Enforce, and Bring About Change

CBF's Litigation Department uses carefully chosen legal action as another tool for advancing the restoration and protection of the Chesapeake Bay, its rivers, lakes, and streams. Litigation is used to not only protect and enforce the current environmental laws but to bring about environmentally friendly change within our legal system. CBF attorneys argue cases in the federal and state courts within the watershed and file amicus curiaealso called Friend of the Court—briefs in related environmental lawsuits.

Carefully executed litigation serves three primary purposes:

  • It spurs enforcement efforts against those who violate laws that were created to protect the watershed.
  • It helps define and drive the agenda for public debate over restoration and protection of the Bay.
  • It delivers concrete and enforceable progress in resource restoration.

Learn more about CBF's active cases, concluded cases, and amicus curiae briefs.

EPA's Pollution Limits for the Chesapeake Bay Are Under Legal Assault.

The American Farm Bureau Federation, The Fertilizer Institute, the National Pork Producers Council, the National Chicken Council, the National Association of Home Builders, and other lobbying groups are trying to eliminate the pollution limits. The fate of these limits and the state clean-up plans—in other words, the whole Chesapeake Clean Water Blueprint—may hinge on what happens in federal court. CBF and others gave their oral arguments in this case in October 2012. A ruling has not yet been issued.

CBF is also working in court to support new EPA regulations to reduce toxic mercury pollution from coal-fired power plants, which contaminates fish and thus puts human health at risk. The federal hazardous air pollutant standards would make a cleaner and healthier Bay, but they have been challenged in the U.S. District Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C., by power companies and others.

Junior Girl Scout troup 10324   Photo by Kimbra Cutlip/CBF StaffJunior Girl Scout troup 10324 of Sparrows Point, Maryland, displays the plaque CBF presented to the troop for its commitment to the Blueprint. Photo by Kimbra Cutlip/CBF Staff

Girl Scouts Defending the Future

Ten-year-old Melek has grown up fishing, swim- ming, and watching osprey raise their young on Jones Creek in Baltimore County. The Chesapeake has always been her playground. So when her grandmother told her that officials from 21 states as far away as Alaska would be fighting against clean water in her own back yard, she was confused and upset.

You may also be interested in:
  • Federal Court Ruling Affirms Chesapeake Bay Blueprint On September 13, 2013, Pennsylvania Federal Judge Sylvia Rambo ruled that the EPA, working with the states, has the authority to set science-based pollution limits for the Chesapeake Bay.
  • Lawsuit Filed Over Sparrows Point Pollution CBF and the Baltimore Harbor WATERKEEPER filed a lawsuit Friday, July 9, 2010 against the current and former owners of the Sparrows Point steel plant, seeking a full investigation and cleanup of illegally discharged hazardous waste.
  • Federal Court Ruling Affirms Chesapeake Bay Blueprint Pennsylvania Federal Judge Sylvia Rambo today issued a ruling upholding Bay clean-up efforts, and rejecting the arguments of the Farm Bureau, the National Association of Home Builders, and other big agriculture interests. The ruling affirmed that EPA, working with the states, has the authority to set science-based pollution limits.
  • CBF Challenges Plan for Offshore Testing at Steel Plant CBF and its partners have appealed a court ruling that would allow the owners of the Sparrows Point steel plant to conduct only a minimal investigation into offshore pollution at the plant.
  • Bear Creek: Where Residents Fish. And Worry. The scariest thing in the area these days certainly isn't black bears. It might be the creek itself.

FY14 Litigation Accomplishments

Advocated in the courts for Bay-saving issues as diverse as land use, development in the Critical Area, and pollution from industrial dischargers and municipal stormwater.

Urged environmental impact studies on the exploration, extraction, and transport of natural gas from Marcellus shale in the Chesapeake Bay watershed.

Filed a petition for judicial review of the Virginia state agricultural feeding operations permit that omitted language mandating the exclusion of livestock from streams.

Argued along with Friends of Frederick (Maryland) in the Frederick County Land Use Case against rezoning plans that would allow for development that could be harmful to the Bay.

Prompted Anne Arundel County Circuit Court to review a permit covering management of polluted runoff.

Joined the Conowingo Hydroelectric Project relicensing process as a voice for clean water in the Chesapeake Bay.

Filed "friend of the court" briefs to support allies in general Maryland appellate court cases on moves like land use, zoning, and polluted runoff control.

You will begin to receive Bay updates from CBF soon.

In the meantime, join the Bay-friendly conversation on Facebook and Twitter!

Questions that require an answer are marked with  *
* Please take a moment to provide the following information so that we may keep you updated on issues and events near you.
 E-Mail Address
 First Name
 Last Name
 Zip Code

1-888-SAVEBAY / 1-888-728-3229

BBB Accredited Charity
GuideStar Exchange Gold Participant Seal

Bids & ProposalsPrivacy Policy

© 2014 Chesapeake Bay Foundation.
All Rights Reserved.

The Chesapeake Bay Foundation is a nonprofit,
tax-exempt charitable organization under
Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.
Donations are tax-deductible as allowed by law.