A great egret stands sentinel in Mattawoman Creek, Charles
County, Maryland. Photo © Krista Schlyer/iLCP
Charles County Resurrects Ill-Advised,
Unsustainable Comprehensive Plan
farming can and is expected to continue in the near future,
the long range
land use over time can be replaced by rural residential housing
on large lots
as the dominant use."
(draft Charles County Comprehensive Plan, p. 3-13)
Three years ago CBF and a coalition of partner groups, citizens, and business
owners stopped a potentially disastrous road project in Charles County called the
Cross County Connector (CCC)
. The victory spurred hope that out-dated land-use policies of the past were
just that and that the county would chart a new, more prosperous and
environmentally sustainable course through the revision of its comprehensive plan
for future growth.
Instead, special interests put forth a proposal that would allow sprawling
growth and resurrect the Cross County Connector—the very same road that the
state and the Army Corps of Engineers refused to permit. Shockingly, a slim
majority of the County's Planning Commission voted to send this plan to the County
Commissioners—against the recommendations of its own professional
planning staff and contrary to several options developed by citizens, businesses
and many others during an extensive public input process.
Click and drag the slider in the center of the image below
right or left to view the Staff and Planning Commission's recommendations.
Draft Plan Flies in the Face of Responsible Land Use
The draft plan now before the Commissioners does not reflect these values.
Instead, the plan would:
- Dramatically increase hard, polluting surfaces in sensitive
watersheds like Mattawoman Creek
- Support ill-conceived and damaging road projects like the
Cross County Connector
- Allow the development of major new subdivisions on farms and
forests across the county.
The draft plan sums it up:
"While farming can and is expected to continue in the near future, the
long range land use over time can be replaced by rural residential housing on large
lots as the dominant use." (draft Charles County Comprehensive Plan, p. 3-13)
The plan would allow for the construction of up to 52,000 new
houses in Charles County, leaving little room for a viable future for farming in
Charles County. This number could include as many as 349 major
subdivisions on septic
systems, generating an additional 215,000 pounds of nitrogen per year to the
county's waterways. By comparison, the La Plata wastewater treatment plant in lower
Charles County is limited to a maximum nitrogen discharge of 18,273 pounds of
nitrogen per year.
Plan Threatens Mattawoman Creek
The additional polluted runoff that would come from such a massive and sprawling development proposal threatens the future of local natural gems like Mattawoman Creek. The Mattawoman is considered one of the most productive fish nursery areas in the Chesapeake and it brings in millions of dollars in economic development from nationally-known bass fishing tournaments. But state biologists say the creek's upstream areas are teetering on the verge of ecological collapse from existing development, and the wide-scale planned additional growth would likely push the vital Mattawoman into dramatic decline. The draft plan would generate twice as much impervious surface when compared to moderate alternatives developed with public input, significantly increasing polluted runoff into waterways.