A Plan to Get Pennsylvania on Track

Pollution Reduction Shortfall Prompts Call to Action

Pennsylvania WIP Gap Chart June 2016Click image to view larger

In June of this year, EPA evaluated progress toward achieving the 2017 mid-point goals and found that while progress has been made, overall, the multi-state region is not on track to achieve its nitrogen pollution reduction targets.

In particular, Pennsylvania is significantly off track, responsible for roughly 86 percent of the current nitrogen pollution reduction gap. This shortfall, largely due to slow implementation of plans to reduce agricultural pollution, threatens to undermine the entire restoration effort.

Press Release: CBF Prioritizes Five Pennsylvania Counties to Jumpstart Cleanup Efforts

White Paper:  "Closing Pennsylvania's Pollution-Reduction Gap"
Cover: Closing Pennsylvania's Pollution-Reduction Gap

Podcast: Turning the Tide

In Episode #39, The Sweet Spot, CBF President Will Baker and Vice President for Environmental Protection and Restoration Kim Coble discuss CBF's proposed approach to reducing pollution in Pennsylvania. Listen now.

On September 13, 2016, the Chesapeake Bay Foundation (CBF) called on Pennsylvania and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to focus additional investments in five south-central counties to accelerate pollution reductions from agriculture.

The list is topped by Lancaster County, which is home to the most productive agricultural land in the Commonwealth but also delivers by far the most nitrogen pollution from agriculture. Next are York, Franklin, Cumberland, and Adams. These counties contribute more than 30 million pounds per year of nitrogen pollution from agriculture to the Chesapeake Bay annually.

Lancaster County Priority WatershedsYork County Priority Watersheds
Franklin County Priority WatershedsCumberland County Priority Watersheds
Adams County Priority Watersheds
Click a county Priority Watershed map to view it larger. To download all five, click here.


CBF analyzed federal agency data to identify these five priority counties that Pennsylvania's Clean Water Blueprint is counting on to reduce the most agricultural pollution. Not surprisingly, the counties that emerged as top priorities also generate the most nitrogen pollution in the Susquehanna Basin.

"Pennsylvania has identified more than 1,400 miles of rivers and streams in these five priority counties as being damaged by agricultural pollution," said CBF's Pennsylvania Executive Director Harry Campbell. "While efforts need to continue in all Pennsylvania watershed counties, by prioritizing new resources in these five counties the Commonwealth can greatly accelerate its restoration efforts."

CBF is calling on federal partners, particularly USDA, to provide an initial, immediate commitment of $20 million in new restoration funds, with a particular focus on the priority counties. The group also urges state and local governments to provide additional outreach, technical assistance, and funding. The new funding will not complete the job, but it is an important start.


In March, Pennsylvania State University College of Agriculture and 120 diverse agriculture stakeholders agreed that resources should be invested in areas of high priority and agricultural practices with the most potential to reduce pollution.

The conference also highlighted "the 3 Ps"—place, practices, and people—and the need for additional investment of public and private funding. The "3 P" approach would ensure strategic use of funds to achieve the greatest nutrient and sediment reductions to benefit both local water quality and the Chesapeake Bay.


Building on this concept, CBF used data from the U.S. Geological Survey and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to identify the individual watersheds that are producing the most nitrogen pollution to local streams and ultimately the Chesapeake Bay.

These five priority counties together include

  • 20 percent of the Commonwealth's farms,
  • 34 percent of total agricultural product sales, and
  • 40 percent of livestock product sales, according to the 2012 Census of Agriculture.
  • They also contribute more than 30 million pounds per year of nitrogen pollution from agriculture to Pennsylvania's rivers and streams, nearly half of the Commonwealth's entire annual load of 63 million pounds.

CBF's analysis of agency data indicates that if the five priority counties—Lancaster, York, Franklin, Cumberland, and Adams—fully met their 2025 Blueprint pollution-reduction commitments, the Commonwealth would achieve roughly a 14.1 million pound nitrogen reduction. That would represent more than half of the entire state's 2025 nitrogen pollution-reduction goal.

"Fast action in these counties would also help the Commonwealth make significant progress against its most immediate challenge, the projected 2017 shortfall of 16 million pounds," said CBF's Pennsylvania Executive Director Harry Campbell. "In addition to reducing pollution, increased federal funding will create jobs and benefit local economies."


In addition to geographic focus, any new resources should also be invested in the pollution reducing practices that will most effectively accelerate progress toward water-quality goals and bring farmers into compliance with state regulations. Based on Pennsylvania’s WIP, there are six conservation practices that, if fully implemented, will achieve more than 70 percent of the necessary nitrogen pollution reductions from agriculture. Importantly, these practices will also reduce the phosphorus and sediment runoff that damages local streams and rivers.

These practices include:

  • conservation tillage;
  • advanced nutrient management;
  • cover crops; animal waste storage systems;
  • forested buffers; and
  • cropland conversion to pasture, hay, or other vegetation.

There is also evidence that many of these practices are among the most cost-effective.

Relative Importance of Agricultural Practices to 2025 Nitrogen-Reduction Goals
Click image to view larger


Many Pennsylvania farmers have shown that they are willing to install conservation practices that reduce pollution. However, every year Pennsylvania farmers who want to install those practices are turned away because of a lack of resources available to assist them.


The successful focusing of geography and practices will depend on strategic coordination and collaboration among existing federal, state, local, non-governmental, and private partners, as well as more efficient delivery of conservation programs. Increased support for outreach and technical assistance capacity—areas that are currently insufficient to keep up with existing demand in some locations—will also be crucial.

If Pennsylvania meets its commitments, a peer-reviewed economic analysis commissioned by CBF found that implementing the Blueprint would increase nature's benefits in the Commonwealth by $6.2 billion annually through cleaner water, cleaner air, hurricane and flood protection, improved recreational opportunities, and more.

For additional details and footnotes, see CBF's white paper, "Closing Pennsylvania's Pollution-Reduction Gap."

PA Top 5 ChartClick image to view larger

Questions that require an answer are marked with  *
* Please take a moment to provide the following information so that we may keep you updated on issues and events near you.
 E-Mail Address
 First Name
 Last Name
 Zip Code
* Timestamp

You will begin to receive Bay updates from CBF soon.

In the meantime, join the Bay-friendly conversation on Facebook and Twitter!


1-888-SAVEBAY / 1-888-728-3229

BBB Accredited Charity
GuideStar Exchange Gold Participant Seal

Bids & ProposalsPrivacy Policy

© 2017 Chesapeake Bay Foundation.
All Rights Reserved.

The Chesapeake Bay Foundation is a nonprofit,
tax-exempt charitable organization under
Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.
Donations are tax-deductible as allowed by law.