Mercury In Our Food
In the Chesapeake watershed, mercury is responsible for more waters listed with fish consumption advisories than any other pollutant. Practical, cost-effective solutions can protect both public health and the natural resources of the Chesapeake Bay.
Mercury in the Environment
Mercury is a highly toxic chemical, especially to the developing nervous system, and can cause IQ deficits in children. For this reason, fetuses, infants, children, and women of childbearing age are at greatest risk.
Mercury increases in concentration as it moves up the food chain as wildlife, fish, and people consume contaminated food. For example, the amount of mercury in fish tissue can be more than a million times higher than in surrounding water.
Though mercury is a naturally occurring element, two-thirds of the mercury moving through the environment is a product of human activities. In many cases, contaminated waters are in areas considered "pristine" with very little human activity or industry.
Although nearly all fish and shellfish contain trace amounts of mercury, they also contain high-quality protein and omega-3 fatty acids. So, make fish part of your healthy diet, but be conscious of your risk factors, avoid fish with higher mercury levels (like swordfish and shark), and check local advisories on fish you catch in local waters.
Where Is the Mercury Coming From?
One answer is: the air. According to EPA, coal-fired power plants are the largest source of mercury air emissions in the U.S., accounting for more than 40 percent of the pollution. Mercury is found in coal. And when coal is burned to make electricity, mercury flows out of the smokestacks of power plants and other coal-burning sources and is washed by rain into the Chesapeake Bay and other waterways.
The Good News
In December 2011, EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson unveiled the nation's first air pollution standards for mercury and other chemicals emitted from power plants. The regulations were mandated by Congress in the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendment, but faced roadblocks from litigation and lobbying.
The Mercury and Air Toxic Standards (MATS) rule will require power plants to cut mercury emissions by at least 90 percent. CBF and others sued EPA to get these rules in place. This is good news for us, the fish we eat, and the air we breathe. EPA predicted as many as 11,000 fewer premature deaths per year, along with the potential for 46,000 short-term construction jobs and 8,000 new permanent jobs in the utility industry associated with the installation and maintenance of pollution controls.
Profits v. People
But the fight isn't over.
Since 2013, the MATS rule has been held up in the courts as the coal industry and its allies fought to derail the regulations, claiming that EPA cannot even decide whether to address major hazards to public health and the environment without first considering the effect on the industry's bottom line. CBF and other environmental groups have intervened throughout these court challenges.
In April 2016, EPA completed an economic analysis supporting the rule and submitted its Supplemental Findings. The findings were challenged by industry groups, and oral arguments were scheduled for May 18, 2017. However, that hearing was postponed while the new Administration reconsidered its position supporting the Supplemental Findings.
In December of 2018, EPA proposed a change in how it looks at the costs and benefits of the Mercury Air Toxics Standards. The proposal states that, "After considering the cost of compliance…the EPA proposes…that it is not "appropriate and necessary" to regulate HAP (hazardous air pollutant) emissions from coal- and oil-fired EGUs (electric utility steam generating units)…" While this proposed rule does not in and of itself change the emission standards and other requirements of the MATS rule, it opens the rule up for future challenges and also puts future analyses of costs and benefits in rulemaking in jeopardy. The proposed revisions were published in the Federal Register on February 7, 2018, kicking off a 60-day comment period.