Tackling Pollution Hotspots

Brian Gish 1171x593

Brian Gish, CBF’s Watershed Coordinator for south-central Pennsylvania, creates restoration plans for impaired waterways.

Brian Gish/CBF Staff

CBF’s Brian Gish discusses the pollution challenges in Pennsylvania’s Lancaster County and the best way to approach them

Getting conservation practices on the ground is one challenge. Getting them in the right places is another. Pollution isn’t spread evenly across the landscape. Rather, the vagaries of topography, soil type, and land management practices create hotspots. Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, is one of them.

“If Lancaster County alone were to clean up its waterways, the entire state would be well on its way to meeting the targets for the Chesapeake Bay,” says Brian Gish, CBF’s Watershed Coordinator in south-central Pennsylvania.

Much of the problem stems from the county’s prodigious agricultural production—it’s among the top 20 counties in the nation by market value, according to the U.S. Census of Agriculture. Approximately 89 percent of its 1,400 miles of streams are deemed “impaired” by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), many from agriculture. That means water quality is too poor to support aquatic life or other uses like recreation, potable water, and fish consumption.

A man in a green kayak uses his paddle to lift a tangled mass of seaweed from the river's surface.

Excess nutrients from fertilizers and animal waste that flow into the Conestoga River cause an explosion of aquatic weeds an algae. After these blooms die, the bacteria that digest their remains steal the water's oxygen, rendering many rivers and streams incapable of supporting healthy and diverse aquatic life.

Codi Yeager/CBF Staff

Gish kayaks down the upper portions of one impaired river, the Conestoga, and uses a paddle to scissor a pile of seaweed into the air.

“If ever there was an example of what excessive nutrients look like in a body of water, this is it,” he says.

For the last five years, Gish and Caitlin Glagola, CBF’s Watershed Coordinator for central Pennsylvania, have created restoration plans to remove rivers like this from the state’s impaired list. Targeting hotspots can focus investments where they are needed most.

Our process taps into community work that is already going on. In the end, that’s what makes these plans well thought-out, well-researched, and something that’s going to work.

– Caitlin Glagola, CBF Watershed Coordinator, Central Pennsylvania

“How can we get to delisting quicker? It’s by doing strategic planning, applying resources and time and investment in specific areas. It’s like triage,” Glagola says.

The planning process begins with mapping and data analysis to help pinpoint areas of high pollution. Community engagement and local partners help identify concerns—like creating fishing and hunting habitat, reducing flood risks and erosion, or providing more water access.

“Our process taps into community work that is already going on,” Glagola says. “In the end, that’s what makes these plans well thought-out, well-researched, and something that’s going to work.”

An approved plan unlocks federal funding for local governments and organizations to implement restoration projects. The first two plans Gish and Glagola completed—for the Pequea Creek and Halfmoon Creek watersheds, respectively—last year secured $3 million in direct federal funding for implementation. Now, they’re working on the upper Conestoga River watershed in Berks, Chester, and Lancaster Counties and Marsh Creek, in Centre County.

Ultimately, delisting the streams depends on more life—specifically aquatic “bugs,” or macroinvertebrates—returning to the water. In Marsh Creek, which is smaller and less impaired, that could happen more quickly. In the Conestoga, where farming and its legacy are more intense, it could take far longer.

Much of the forest that once sheltered the creek is gone. So too are the pebbly bottoms where bugs hide and fish lay their eggs. In many places, farmland stretches all the way to the water. Gish observes the bare stream banks, the wide, pond-like water baked by sun and clogged with brown weeds.

“It’s never going to be like that again,” he says. “But it doesn’t have to be like this.” He shares a picture on his phone to prove it. It shows a beautiful brook trout he caught in the Pequea Creek watershed, in the county where he grew up fishing. It is also impaired and was long devoid of trout, which require cold,oxygen-rich water. The trout’s return gives him hope for the Conestoga, too.

Take a look at our fall Save the Bay magazine for more stories like this.

Codi Yeager-90x110

Codi Yeager

Senior Writer, CBF

[email protected]

Issues in this Post

Agriculture   Community   Forest Loss   Habitat Loss   Restoration   Water Quality   CBF in Pennsylvania  




Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in the media or articles on this site are those of the speakers or authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions held by CBF and the inclusion of such information does not imply endorsement by CBF. CBF is not responsible for the contents of any linked Website, or any link contained in a linked Website, or any changes or updates to such Websites. The inclusion of any link is provided only for information purposes.


Support the Chesapeake Bay Foundation

Your donation helps the Chesapeake Bay Foundation maintain our momentum toward a restored Bay, rivers, and streams for today and generations to come.

Donate Today

Stay Up-to-Date on Bay News

Want to stay up-to-date on all news and happenings in your region and across the Chesapeake watershed? Join our digital community.

Sign Up
x
This website uses cookies to tailor and enhance your online experience. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. For more information, including details on how to disable cookies, please visit our Privacy Policy. Close